APEC Publications | Measuring Progress in Implementing APEC’s IFAP: Establishing a methodology and selecting key performance indicators, October 2009

Announcement

No Announcement.

Measuring Progress in Implementing APEC’s IFAP: Establishing a methodology and selecting key performance indicators, October 2009

Measuring Progress in Implementing APECâs IFAP: Establishing a methodology and selecting key performance indicators, October 2009

PUBLICATION NUMBER
APEC#209-SE-01.10
YEAR
2009
PUBLISHED DATE
December 2009
TYPE OF PUBLICATION
Reports
PUBLICATIONS UNDER
PAGES
76
ACCESSED
65364

 

Individual Files

1 IFAP AND THE IMPORTANCE OF FDI
A. The Investment Facilitation Action Plan
B. The importance of foreign investment, and especially FDI

2 ATTRACTING FOREIGN INVESTMENT – THE LOCATION OFFER
A. IFAP and attracting investment

3 METHODOLOGY FOR MEASURING PROGRESS
A. General approach
B. What are we measuring?
C. Measuring the quality of investment-related policy
D. Absolute or relative performance?
E. Aggregating the KPIs
F. Presentation of results

4 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
A. Selecting key performance indicators
B. Summary of key performance indicators
C. Filling the gaps

5 APPLYING THE METHODOLOGY
A. Illustrative example
B. Measuring progress

6 OVERCOMING KPI GAPS THROUGH A STAKEHOLDER SURVEY
A. Survey design
B. Survey implementation

APPENDICES
A KPIs used in the illustrative example
B Stakeholder survey




Description

This paper aims to develop a methodology to measure APEC member economies’ progress in terms of implementing IFAP, and to identify key performance indicators that can be used to provide a consistent basis for measurement of IFAP progress over the 2008-10 period.




Download

File size: 415.16KB



Find Out More

Policy Support Unit

INDIVIDUAL FILES

Individual Files

1 IFAP AND THE IMPORTANCE OF FDI
A. The Investment Facilitation Action Plan
B. The importance of foreign investment, and especially FDI

2 ATTRACTING FOREIGN INVESTMENT – THE LOCATION OFFER
A. IFAP and attracting investment

3 METHODOLOGY FOR MEASURING PROGRESS
A. General approach
B. What are we measuring?
C. Measuring the quality of investment-related policy
D. Absolute or relative performance?
E. Aggregating the KPIs
F. Presentation of results

4 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
A. Selecting key performance indicators
B. Summary of key performance indicators
C. Filling the gaps

5 APPLYING THE METHODOLOGY
A. Illustrative example
B. Measuring progress

6 OVERCOMING KPI GAPS THROUGH A STAKEHOLDER SURVEY
A. Survey design
B. Survey implementation

APPENDICES
A KPIs used in the illustrative example
B Stakeholder survey



DESCRIPTIONS

Description

This paper aims to develop a methodology to measure APEC member economies’ progress in terms of implementing IFAP, and to identify key performance indicators that can be used to provide a consistent basis for measurement of IFAP progress over the 2008-10 period.

DOWNLOAD

Download

File size: 415.16KB


FIND OUT MORE

Find out more

Policy Support Unit